Question – TASK 1
The chart below shows the percentage of households owning different electronic devices in 2005 and 2015.
Device 2005 2015
Computer 55% 85%
Mobile phone 62% 95%
Tablet 0% 48%
Television 90% 96%
The bar chart compares the proportion of households that owned four types of electronic devices in 2005 and 2015.
Overall, ownership of all electronic devices showed an upward trend over the period of ten years. While television remained the most commonly owned household item, gradually mobile phones experienced the most significant growth. In addition, tablets emerged as a new technology by 2015.
In 2005, television was the most popular device, with 90% of households owning one. This figure rose slightly to 96% in 2015. Likewise, computer ownership increased considerably, climbing from 55% to 82%, which represents a rise of 27 percentage points.
A similar trend could be seen in mobile phone ownership. The percentage of households possessing a mobile phone grew substantially from 62% in 2005 to 95% ten years later, making it almost as common as television. By contrast, no households owned tablets in 2005 because they had not yet become widely available. However, by 2015, nearly half of all households, at 48%, had purchased one.
TASK 2 –
Some people believe that universities should only accept students with the highest marks, while others think they should also consider qualities such as motivation and work experience. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People hold different opinions regarding the criteria that universities should use when selecting students. While some argue that admission should be based solely on academic performance, others believe that personal qualities and practical experience should also be taken into account. This essay will discuss both perspectives before explaining why I support the latter view.
On the one hand, selecting students according to their examination results is considered a fair and objective approach. High grades usually demonstrate that an applicant possesses the knowledge, discipline, and intellectual ability required for higher education. Moreover, universities often receive thousands of applications each year, making academic scores an efficient way to compare candidates. As a result, this method helps institutions maintain high academic standards.
On the other hand, academic achievement is not the only factor that determines future success. Motivation, communication skills, leadership, and relevant work experience can be equally valuable, especially in subjects such as business, medicine, or engineering. For instance, a student who has volunteered in hospitals may be better prepared for medical studies than someone with slightly higher grades but no practical experience. Furthermore, motivated students are often more willing to overcome challenges and continue improving throughout their university education.
In my opinion, universities should adopt a balanced selection process. Although strong academic performance is essential, personal qualities and practical achievements provide a more complete picture of an applicant’s potential. By considering both aspects, educational institutions are more likely to admit students who will excel academically while also making meaningful contributions to society.
In conclusion, although examination results remain an important indicator of academic ability, universities should not rely on them exclusively. Instead, combining academic performance with motivation and relevant experience would lead to a fairer and most effective admission process.





